<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rule of Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://grahamtx.net/greg/2008/05/10/the-rule-of-faith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://grahamtx.net/greg/2008/05/10/the-rule-of-faith/</link>
	<description>The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://grahamtx.net/greg/2008/05/10/the-rule-of-faith/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grahamtx.net/greg/2008/05/10/the-rule-of-faith/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I don't think he's saying consistency in general is an indicator of truth. Rather, he's saying there is a difference between doctrines that could be traced back to apostolic times, and contradictory doctrines, such as gnosticism, that had developed later. 

Interestingly, Origen was very prolific and had a very inquisitive nature. In his attempts to explain certain mysteries he sometimes  said things that were later determined to be erroneous. Therefore, later generations used Origen's own criteria to condemn some of his teachings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s saying consistency in general is an indicator of truth. Rather, he&#8217;s saying there is a difference between doctrines that could be traced back to apostolic times, and contradictory doctrines, such as gnosticism, that had developed later. </p>
<p>Interestingly, Origen was very prolific and had a very inquisitive nature. In his attempts to explain certain mysteries he sometimes  said things that were later determined to be erroneous. Therefore, later generations used Origen&#8217;s own criteria to condemn some of his teachings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear</title>
		<link>http://grahamtx.net/greg/2008/05/10/the-rule-of-faith/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://grahamtx.net/greg/2008/05/10/the-rule-of-faith/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I don't disagree w/ the quote, however, if he's saying that consistent doctrine thru the ages signifies truth, I'd have to say that many negative beliefs have also transcended time.

I am VERY open to the idea that I don't understand his meaning. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree w/ the quote, however, if he&#8217;s saying that consistent doctrine thru the ages signifies truth, I&#8217;d have to say that many negative beliefs have also transcended time.</p>
<p>I am VERY open to the idea that I don&#8217;t understand his meaning. <img src='http://grahamtx.net/greg/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
