9
Dec

Immaculate Conception

   Posted by: greg   in Catholic, Marian, Theology

Yesterday was the feast of the Immaculate Conception of Mary. I ran across these notes from a blog I read written by a Benedictine Monk. He doesn’t provide much explanation, but I was still impressed.

I have heard Tim Staples make the connection between the virgin Earth , unstained by sin, from which the first Adam was formed and the Virgin Mary, unstained by sin, from which the second Adam, Jesus Christ, was formed, but Fr. Stephanos brings out more parallels here than I remember from Tim Staples. Beyond that, Fr. Stephanos draws a parallel between the Virgin Mary and the virgin tomb, which “gave birth” to the resurrected Christ. He even points out that Christ emerged from the tomb without breaking the seal of the tomb. (It was the angel that rolled away the stone in order to reveal the already empty tomb, Mt 28:2.) This is parallel to the early tradition that Christ emerged from the womb of Mary in some miraculous manner such that the integrity of her virginity was not violated. (Although Catholic dogma of the Eternal Virginity of Mary does not insist on this particular detail, it is a common Catholic belief.)

This entry was posted on Sunday, December 9th, 2007 at 2:30 pm and is filed under Catholic, Marian, Theology. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

3 comments so far

 1 

Why does Mary have to have an immaculate conception? It’s not scriptural or logical. HER mother wasn’t immaculately conceived and thus, any benefit to Jesus is nullified. Jesus is the one perfect God-man. The miracle, a sign to King Ahaz, was that JESUS was born of a virgin, a thing possible only to God. It’s superstition, Greg, the babbling of men!

January 16th, 2008 at 10:25 pm
 2 

Jesus’s righteousness was born from God alone. Mary only contributed the flesh, as it were. Begotten of the Father, not made. He is God and he benefits nothing from the flesh. I’m sorry if this offends, I won’t be offended if you don’t publish it, but I wonder who bewitched you and my sister that you have fallen for another gospel based on the traditions of men. It breaks my heart and it makes me mad.

January 16th, 2008 at 10:31 pm
greg
 3 

Bill,
You have some misconceptions of the Catholic belief about Mary. The Immaculate Conception is a doctrine about how Mary could be part of humanity redeemed by Christ, but also be completely pure and without sin. It is not a matter so much of a benefit needed for Jesus, but of Mary’s role as the first member and mother of the Church. There are many parallels between Mary as the New Eve and the Church as the bride of Christ. Eve was created without sin, but said no to the plan of God, which led to the fall. Mary was created without sin, and said yes to the plan of God, which led to the new humanity. The Church is indwelt by the Holy Spirit and gives the Word of God to the world. Mary was overshadowed by the Holy Spirit, and brought forth the Word of God to the world. The doctrines about Mary are so rich, I can only begin to scratch the surface.

Here are some references that may help you out with a better understanding of these doctrines.
First, if you’re willing to do some lengthy reading, I recommend The Dogmatic Constitution on the Church [ http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html ], which is one of the two foundational documents from the Second Vatican Council. Chapter 8 (starting in paragraph 52) focuses on Mary and her role and identification with the Church.
A much shorter, less in depth, and a little less authoritative source is from the Catechism of the Catholic Church about the Virgin Birth of Jesus [ http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1K.HTM ], which also gets into doctrines about his mother.
Finally, I’ve skimmed this article from the Catholic Encyclopedia [ http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm ] which looks pretty good. It’s not authoritative, but they usually do a good job and provide lots of background material.

January 17th, 2008 at 4:04 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment